Modcraft - The community dedicated to quality WoW modding!

Community => Random => Topic started by: Will on May 24, 2012, 12:55:53 am

Title: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Will on May 24, 2012, 12:55:53 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiRZwBX3wZo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiRZwBX3wZo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)

Watch. Pretty funneh.
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: XxXGenesisXxX on May 24, 2012, 01:44:13 am
Not bad. Wouldn't mind seeing a full movie of it xD
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: kinzcool on May 24, 2012, 04:53:47 am
LOL   :)
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: darkleen on May 24, 2012, 06:57:45 am
lol that awesome
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Steff on May 24, 2012, 03:24:31 pm
I like .net much ore then Java ;) But if it must run on all os whya not jsut use c++ + boost + qt + all the other nice stuff out there.
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Sina on May 24, 2012, 03:26:21 pm
They cut out the sex-part Oô (not joking!)

Look it up somewhere other to see the full "film" (:
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Will on May 24, 2012, 03:38:27 pm
Yeah, they did cut it out.. Lol.

I agree with Steff, Java is somewhat pointless if you can use C++ well. I suppose Java is easier to learn?
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Will on May 24, 2012, 05:38:28 pm
All the above is true.

Java is kinder to ones eyes and brain.. Not as kind as py though or as3 ^_^
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Steff on May 24, 2012, 09:24:58 pm
But Java stuck in movement some years ago. c# .net ist the same in Microsoft blue and includes curent technologies and is developed active. Also you get a free great IDE with full GUI editor.
And if you think you need it for all OS you can just stay on 2.0 and use mono.

reinvent the wheel < I dont find anything in java or .net that is not also there in c++ in some lib like boost or qt.
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: yubiyoy on May 25, 2012, 11:07:22 pm
Hillarious, and i don't really need subtitles since its norweigan so its even better!
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Ascathos on June 02, 2012, 05:51:31 pm
This was definitely amusing. Well done and good idea :p

EDIT:
Irony that they "check" .net on Mac :p ?
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Keta on June 02, 2012, 07:53:32 pm
Quote from: "Steff"
But Java stuck in movement some years ago. c# .net ist the same in Microsoft blue and includes curent technologies and is developed active. Also you get a free great IDE with full GUI editor.
And if you think you need it for all OS you can just stay on 2.0 and use mono.

reinvent the wheel < I dont find anything in java or .net that is not also there in c++ in some lib like boost or qt.

Steff, you know as well as I that C# COMES from C++. Java, I dunno about. But anyway, so obviously anything you can do in C#, you can also do in C++. The wonder about C# is that its much more understandable, while still allowing a PRETTY wide variety of programming.

Thanks
Keta
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Steff on June 03, 2012, 12:45:07 am
No c# hase nothing to do with c++ beside the name.

c# is one of the .net framework languages and produce the same target code as VB.net.  c++/CLI or F#. It is the same concept as Java, only that the development don´t stuck because of selling companys :)

There was even a law fight between Microsoft and Sun because MS direct implemented the Java system but fork it then and change many stuff what went against the platform independence.

Java get again pushed since Oracle takeover un. We will see what the future brings. :)

http://www.oracle.com/de/technologies/java/index.html (http://www.oracle.com/de/technologies/java/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: Morfium on July 08, 2012, 02:37:58 pm
Haha, nice video. Even though I hate developing in Java with all my heart. ^^
But I think when it comes to programming languages we will never find one that everybody likes. ;)
I for example love C#. Mainly because it's so nice and easy to read and got an awesome ide. C++ and Obj-C with all their asterisks and arrows and stuff always look so... chaotic to me. XD
But it's just a matter of taste.
Title: Re: Java vs .net (Funny..)
Post by: hornobster on July 10, 2012, 06:26:16 pm
lol they should really make such a film

Quote from: "Morfium"
Haha, nice video. Even though I hate developing in Java with all my heart. ^^
But I think when it comes to programming languages we will never find one that everybody likes. ;)
I for example love C#. Mainly because it's so nice and easy to read and got an awesome ide. C++ and Obj-C with all their asterisks and arrows and stuff always look so... chaotic to me. XD
But it's just a matter of taste.
same here