Forum > Resources and Tools

[RELEASE] "Better" Procedural Water 3.3.5a

<< < (13/31) > >>

Amaroth:
I heard something about working on WoD modding tools. Would be far better than Cata/MoP. But well, this is starting to be a lil' OT.

phantomx:
I've been working on some tools to ease mass amounts of work for WoD as well as making some of the current tools more compatible so we breake less things :p was also working on WoD water looking pretty nice so far.

P.S

Mind my typing not on the computer.

Steff:
The client is not the problem.
The server is.

Milly:

--- Quote from: "iindigo" ---It'd be pretty great if the community as a whole moved to Cata or MoP. WotLK is getting long on the tooth and the Cata/MoP clients have some pretty useful features that are absent from older versions.
--- End quote ---
My goal for a while was to help try and move the community into the direction of upgrading to Cata, and then to MoP, etc. Yet ultimately, almost a year later I decided to return to WotLK. Only true reason I left was because of graphics and maps. But almost all of these things can be ported back. And there are so many complications with the later expansions.

I'd agree that a move up to WoD would be healthy for the community provided that there are enough software programmers interested in making tools. And I don't see that as a viable reality. Blizzard has covered their tracks several times since WotLK, and hardly anyone has even made any effort towards Cata yet. We're a dying breed as modders, who make mods for a dying game.

i'd love to program my own tools and make some steps forward but I don't have the discipline to learn.

Steff:
The problems of the community is not the software.
I realy have problems with the people.
Promisses over and over but noone finish hiw work.

And sadly I know that you can´t finish an mmo alone.

Thanks good there are some people you can count on, but the mass just wast your time to get them in and setup all the stuff. And if it goes to finish a job.... Nothing.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version