Forum > Random

Java vs .net (Funny..)

<< < (2/3) > >>

Sina:
They cut out the sex-part Oô (not joking!)

Look it up somewhere other to see the full "film" (:

Will:
Yeah, they did cut it out.. Lol.

I agree with Steff, Java is somewhat pointless if you can use C++ well. I suppose Java is easier to learn?

Will:
All the above is true.

Java is kinder to ones eyes and brain.. Not as kind as py though or as3 ^_^

Steff:
But Java stuck in movement some years ago. c# .net ist the same in Microsoft blue and includes curent technologies and is developed active. Also you get a free great IDE with full GUI editor.
And if you think you need it for all OS you can just stay on 2.0 and use mono.

reinvent the wheel < I dont find anything in java or .net that is not also there in c++ in some lib like boost or qt.

yubiyoy:
Hillarious, and i don't really need subtitles since its norweigan so its even better!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page